Home Purpose About Us Blog Articles Search Media Links Culture21 PodCasts Subscribe
Book Review: After America, Mark Steyn's Brilliant Doomsday Tome
August 16, 2011, Matthew Cochrane

  

Update: Welcome all Steyn Online readers!

I always wondered how a devout Jew reacted after God had sent ancient Israel a prophet, say Jeremiah, to warn His chosen people of pending disaster unless the country quickly repented and changed its ways. I imagine the sensation is at least somewhat similar to reading Mark Steyn’s After America. For, like an Old Testament prophet sent to warn a people of their forthcoming destruction, Steyn sounds the doomsday alarm: America is a declining superpower and will soon fall hard from its perch of leadership over the rest of the world.

In his last major book, America Alone, Mark Steyn posited that Western civilization in Europe was in the throes of death, and that it would be up to America to carry the torch. “A warning,” Steyn says near the beginning of After America, “that proved so influential that America decided to sign up for the same program but supersized. Heigh-ho.”
 
Now, Steyn warns, America is quickly following its European colleagues into perpetual decline and, unless the country acts quickly and decisively, will soon find itself in a significantly weakened position in a dangerous post-American world. Steyn makes it clear he doesn’t enjoy being a doomsday prophet and finds no joy or satisfaction in his message:
 
Nobody writes a doomsday tome because they want it to come true. From an author’s point-of-view, the apocalypse is not helpful: the bookstores get looted and the collapse of the banking system makes it harder to cash the royalty check.
 
Western civilization, Steyn writes, “is a synthesis – a multicultural synthesis, if you like: Athenian democracy, Roman law, the Hebrew Bible, dispersed by London to every corner of the globe.” In many ways, America is the culmination of this glorious heritage. Unfortunately, America now more closely resembles the newer, degenerated versions of these once-great geopolitical states (Rome, Athens, Britain and Jerusalem), than their celebrated pasts, which so mightily contributed to the founding of our country.
 
The New Rome
 
“Long before they slump into poverty,” Steyn writes, “great powers succumb to a poverty of ambition.” Visit Italy today and one can browse the city streets and tour the remnants of Rome’s storied past. Yet it has been nearly two thousand years since Rome mattered in a fundamental way. Like Rome, Steyn argues, America is living off of the memories of its past achievements while unable to currently muster the ability to accomplish much of anything. As Steyn puts it, “America has a money-is-no-object government with a lot of money but no great objects.”
 
This is because, Steyn explains, “the bigger government gets, the less it does.” Say what you will about the relative success or failure of Hoover’s and Roosevelt’s policies during the Great Depression, but the Hoover Dam was a monumental feat that used renewable energy and prompted the growth of an entire region of the country. It was also completed two years ahead of schedule! Now, Steyn laments, government is more apt to release a study saying the Hoover Dam is non-compliant with an obscure environmental regulation and close it down than it is to build a new one! Steyn concludes this is just part of progressives’ overall war on progress. Indeed, Steyn says, just as the “late Roman Empire was no longer an aqueduct-building culture, we are no longer a dam-building one.” And that’s a damming indictment on modern day America!
 
Another example: Forty years ago NASA put the first man on the moon. Now, after scrapping the shuttle program, NASA can’t even put a man in space. But don’t worry, that’s not NASA’s concern anymore as NASA administrator Charles Bolden explained in an al-Jazeera interview. Bolden stated that one of the primary goals given to America’s space agency by President Obama was finding a way to “reach out to the Muslim world.” Using his trademark wit, Steyn writes:
 
Islam: The final frontier! To boldly go where no diversity outreach consultant has gone before! What’s “foremost” for NASA is to make Muslims “feel good” about their contribution to science. Why, as recently as the early ninth century Muhammad al-Kwarizmi invented the first universal horary quadrant!
 
During the Great Depression, the Empire State Building, then the world’s tallest building, was built in eighteen months because, as Steyn puts it, “the head of General Motors wanted to show the head of Chrysler that he could build something that went higher than the Chrysler Building.” Now? There’s a gaping hole and a mere skeleton of a new construction project at Ground Zero ten years and $7 billion after 9/11. Meanwhile other countries have been quite busy:
 
In the decade after 9/11, China (which America still thinks of as a cheap assembly plant for your local Krappimart) built the Three Gorges Dam, the largest electricity-generating plant in the world. Dubai, a mere sub-jurisdiction of the United Arabs Emirate, put up the world’s tallest building and built a Busby Berkeley geometric kaleidoscope of offshore artificial islands. Brazil, an emerging economic power, began diverting the Sao Francisco River to create some 400 miles of canals to irrigate its parched northeast.
 
Contrasting these nations’ recent feats to ours, it seems pretty obvious which culture is declining and which are rising. “A wealthy nation”, Steyn ominously concludes, “living on the accumulated cultural capital of a glorious past can dodge its rendezvous with fate, but only for so long.”
 
The New Athens
 
A little more than a year ago Greeks took to the street to riot after the government was forced to consider “strict” austerity measures as it neared total bankruptcy and a bailout by the European Union. The mob, consisting mostly of civil workers, burned down a bank killing three of its employees that were trapped inside. The rioters refused to let the employees out or rescue workers in to save the victims. Steyn writes:
 
Unlovely as they are, the Greek rioters are the logical end point of the advanced social democratic state: not an oppressed underclass, but a spoiled overclass, rioting in defense of its privileges and insisting on more subsidy, more benefits, more featherbedding, more government.
 
Steyn states what everyone knows but is afraid to say: The welfare state of Europe and, to a slightly lesser degree, America, is simply unsustainable. “When you’re spending four trillion dollars but only raising two trillion in revenue (the Democrat model),” Steyn argues, “you’ve no intention of paying it off, and the rest of the world knows it.” The Obama administration, upon taking office, took the average Bush deficit from 2001-2008 and doubled it – all the way to 2020.
 
America’s debt has other consequences besides just the obvious ones. In 2010, half of our debt was owned by foreigners, and most of that was held by the Chinese. Steyn continues (emphasis mine):
 
What does that mean? In 2010, the U.S. spent about $663 billion on its military, China about $78 billion. If the People’s Republic carries on buying American debt at the rate it has in recent times, then within a few years U.S. interest payments on that debt will be covering the entire cost of the Chinese armed forces.
 
Yikes! And all that, Steyn mentions, while China is undergoing, according to alarming Pentagon reports, a “massive military build-up.” In other words, we are paying what might be our most dangerous enemy to build-up and maintain it’s military. Can someone say insane?
 
Yet the economic argument is only the first, and simplest, argument against the Europeanization of America. The second is subtler. “Advanced social democracies don’t need a value-added tax,” Steyn writes, “they need a value-added life.” Channeling his earlier work, America Alone, Steyn once again notes Europe’s plunging birth rates and its declining native populations. For Europeans, a state welfare-coddled existence has made them stop from even caring about the future. Indeed, their state-funded lifestyles have seemingly robbed the very meaning from life:
 
You don’t need to make material sacrifices: the state takes care of all that. You don’t need to have children. And you certainly don’t need to die for king and country. But a society that has nothing to die for has nothing to live for: it’s no longer a stream, but a stagnant pool…Europe’s economic crisis is a mere symptom of its existential crisis: What is life for? What gives it meaning? Post-Christian, post-nationalist, post-modern Europe has no answer to that question, and so it has 30-year-old students and 50-year-old retirees, and wonders why the small band of workers in between them can’t make the math add up. Yet it’s not about the arithmetic, but about instilling in people for whom life is a diversion a sense of purpose larger than themselves: What’s it all about, Alfie?
  
The New Britain
 
“When a society loses its memory,” asserts Steyn, “it descends inevitably into dementia.” Steyn states the British were arguably “the greatest force for good” in the last century and, as much as the world can say it functions, “it’s due largely to the Britannic influence.” Of this there can be no argument. The English made law, democracy and capitalism “permanent features of the landscape” around most of the world.
 
For all this inheritance, Britain does not have much to show for it today. Due to an unhealthy entitlement mentality stemming from a dependence on government and the gospel of multiculturalism, many young Britons are cut off from their cultural identity. The numbers are startling:
 
After empire, Britain turned inward: between 1951 and 1997 the proportion of government expenditure on defense fell from 24 percent to 7, while the proportion on health and welfare rose from 22 percent to 53. And that’s before New Labour came along to widen the gap.
 
It gets worse. Forty percent of British citizens now receive government handouts. Twenty percent of British children are raised in homes in which no adult works. Worst of all, “just under 900,000 have been off sick for over a decade, claiming ‘sick benefits,’ week in, week out for ten years and counting.” Steyn continues:
 
What happens when, as a matter of state policy, you debauch your human capital? The United Kingdom has the highest drug use in Europe, the highest incidence of sexually transmitted disease, the highest number of single mothers, the highest abortion rate; marriage is all but defunct except for toffs, upscale gays, and Muslims.
 
No, I don’t know what “toffs” means either, but these numbers are certainly dismal. Absent their own identity, the British youth are left seeking on their own for meaning in life:
 
If you cut off two generations of students from their cultural inheritance, why be surprised that legions of British Muslims sign up for the Taliban? These are young men who went to school in Luton and West Bromich and learned nothing of their country of nominal citizenship other than that it’s responsible for racism, imperialism, colonialism, and all the other bad-isms of the world. If that’s all you knew of Britain, why would you feel any allegiance to Queen and country?
 
Following in the footsteps of Britain, Americans’ dependence on government handouts grows by the day and a generation of Americans is quickly losing their sense of identity. America is famously a “proposition nation” as Steyn calls it, a country “defined not by blood but by an idea.” That idea is freedom. Yet, what happens when America loses the commonality of that idea?
 
While freedom is being threatened by a variety of sources, one of the problems, Steyn points out, is that more and more laws and regulations are being enacted by unelected bureaucrats in safe government jobs and not by elected officials. In 2010, when liberals failed to pass a cap-and-trade bill in Congress, they blithely brushed off the defeat and suggested the EPA could enact the law all by itself. Steyn asks, “Where do you go to vote out the EPA?” Steyn concludes these alphabet bureaucracies have caused us to devolve “from republican self-government to a micro-regulated nursery.”  
 
Steyn uses a shocking anecdote to illustrate his point: In the spring of 2009, Pennsylvania’s state government began cracking down on the selling of illegal substances that had been going unchecked for decades. For just one dollar, many people were able to purchase small portions of this prohibited good. Indeed, St. Cecilia’s Catholic Church in Rochester, PA had been selling homemade pies every Friday at their weekly fish fry during Lent for decades. The perps were all elderly ladies who donated their time and expertise of baking goodies to their church to help raise money. Yet, as the state inspector explained, because the pies were not being baked in a state-inspected kitchen, the pies could not be sold for money. As an alternative, the inspector suggested, the ladies could each pay a fee to have the inspector certify their respective kitchens or come into the church’s certified kitchen to bake their goods. As 73-year old Louise Humpbert justly complained, that was just “ridiculous.”
 
It’s not just the elderly the state is going after. Seven-year-old Julie Murphy, from Portland, OR, was selling lemonade like any other industrious kid, when officers demanded to see her “temporary restaurant license.” The license costs $120 and, when Julie did not have it, the officers threatened her with a $500 fine. Julie cried. Steyn writes:
 
No matter how you slice it, this is tyranny…In a small but tangible way, a person who submits to a state pie regime is a subject, not a citizen…
 
In another example, California’s inspection goons determined a hardware store was in violation for providing coffee, free of charge, to its customers on Saturday mornings.
 
When the law says it’s illegal for a storekeeper to offer his customer a cup of coffee, you should be proud to be in non-compliance. Otherwise, what the hell did you guys bother holding a revolution for? Say what you like about George III, but he didn’t prosecute the Boston Tea Party for unlicensed handling of beverage ingredients in a public place.
 
Indeed, Steyn writes, freedom is at the heart of the modern day tea party movement too:
 
That’s why these protests are called Tea Parties – because the heart of the matter is the same question posed two and a half centuries ago: Are Americans subjects or citizens?
 
As America loses its unifying concept of freedom, including the principle of federalism, which allows local communities to live as they see fit, Steyn predicts states will start to seek secession from the union in hopes to survive. He writes, “Balkanization will cease to be a pejorative and become the least worst hope: united we’re done for, but divided a few corners of the map might stand a chance.”
 
The New Jerusalem
 
How will America soon resemble the Jerusalem of today? No matter how hard a post-modern, post-great-power tact Americans try to take we will not be able to retreat from the world’s problems. Indeed, in a post-American superpower world, Americans will find the danger even closer to home rather than half a world away.
 
In 2010 Zogby polled the “moderate” Arab world to see how Arabic opinion of America had changed after two years of Obama’s international apology tour. In 2008, 83% of Arabs had a “very” or “somewhat” negative view of America. In 2010, it was 85%.  In other words, there was virtually no difference. Why?
 
Because sometimes who you are is more important than anything you do. America will discover, as Israel did, that a one-way urge for normaliut will lead to a more dangerous world. In the vacuum of U.S. retreat, anti-Americanism will nevertheless metastasize and crowd in from our borders.
 
America’s retreat from the world is already underway. China is now the biggest trading partner of emerging economic powerhouses like India and Brazil and is the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter. It should not surprise us, Steyn says, that “getting on with America matters less and less.” Looking down the road a bit, the picture gets even grimmer:
 
Picture the UN a few years down the road: for three of the Security Council’s permanent members (Britain, France, Russia), an accommodation with Islam will be a domestic political imperative, and getting along with China will be the overriding foreign priority….There will be no new world order, only a world with no order, in which pipsqueak failed states go nuclear while the planet’s wealthiest nations are unable to defend their borders and are forced to adjust to the post-American era as they can. Yet, in such a geopolitical scene, whatever survives of the United States will still be the most inviting target – first because it’s big; and second because, as Britain knows, the durbar moves on but the imperial resentments linger long after imperial grandeur.
 
At the end of the day, “Washington will be the new Jerusalem – a beleaguered citadel in a world that wants to kill it.”
 
The Glimmer of Hope
 
By the end of After America’s 400 pages of doom-and-gloom, Steyn’s message is pretty disheartening. While relaying the pessimistic gist of the book to some relatives, they wanted to know if Steyn believes there is any hope left for America. Yes…but just a glimmer. Crucial distinctions do remain between America, the land of the free, and the rest of the world. 
 
In France, mobs rioted over modest proposals to raise the retirement age. In Britain, students rioted when small attempts were made to cut spending. Steyn continues:
 
Everywhere from Iceland to Bulgaria angry mobs besieged their parliaments demanding the same thing: Why didn’t you the government do more for me? America was the only nation in the developed world where millions of people took to the streets to tell the state: I can do just fine if you control-freak statists would shove your non-stimulating stimulus, your jobless jobs bill, and your multitrillion-dollar-porkathons, and just stay the hell out of my life and pocket.
 
Steyn concludes, “That’s the America that has a fighting chance.” In the final chapter, as a guideline to fighting Big Government’s encroachment upon our liberties, Steyn offers nine “D’s” America must do to turn around our ship: de-centralize, de-governmentalize, de-regulate, de-monopolize, de-complicate, de-credentialize, dis-entitle, de-normalize, and do.
  
For all the book’s negative subject matter, Steyn does a masterful job of using his wit and humor to keep the narrative flowing. Like a spoonful of sugar helping the medicine go down, his sharp humor makes the bad news a lot easier to take. As Ann Coulter says, “Only Mark Steyn can write about the decline of America and leave you laughing.” 
 
The end result is a book that will have to be wrestled with by conservatives as we approach the 2012 elections. If some might underestimate the importance of the election, which finds America at a crucial crossroads, a read through these pages will quickly correct the problem. For, while Europe is already being hurled over the top of the waterfall of fiscal and cultural destruction, America can still paddle to the shore but only if we start paddling right now. Like ancient Israel after God sent Jeremiah, we cannot say we weren’t warned.

  

Comments
You know how you feel like you have seen the whole movie after watching a long trailer for it? That's how I feel after reading this review - like I just read the whole thing. Is there more stuff in the book itself, a reason to buy the book other than what we have already read in this review? JW. - Stephen (08/16/11 1:47 PM)

So, so much more. Believe it or not, this review was originally almost twice as long. It was hard cutting it down to size. I know it was long but some books deserve more serious consideration than others. This one of those rare books that only comes along a few times each generation; easily one of the most powerful political books I have ever read.

- Matthew Cochrane (08/16/11 2:23 PM)

Matthew - I have the good fortune of working with your mother and we periodically venture into the political arena. Sometimes it seems like we are the only 2 conservative voices here. Coincidently I started Mark Steyn's book last night and could not put it down. Naturally I recommended it to your mom who was way ahead of me and a Steyn fan already. She is the quiet voice of good sense around here.

I have just read your excellent article and although its lengthy, there's a lot to say and you have said it well. Please accept my compliments on your writing, which is of a very high calibre and compares favorably to some of my favorites, including Steyn, Sowell, Malkin, Glick and a number of other conservative commentators.

I always enjoy finding new voices of reason and I shall follow your blog.

Keep up the fine work.    

- Brian Freedman (08/16/11 5:14 PM)

 Great article.  I wonder how a liberal would react to reading this book.  Would it be eye-opening or would they think it's garbage?  I'm not talking "crazy" liberals, but moderates.  

I found the section about Britain especially interesting (and scary).  When people don't have a purpose, they will look for one and find one...or find a way to numb themselves from the fact that they are lacking.  Scary how morally devoid America continues to become.  We need to keep on plowing ahead to better this country for our kids.  We can bring back the morals and values that our country was built upon-- with lots of prayer and efforts like this blog!

I keep thinking about how crazy it is how many Americans seem to hate America--yet they are completely dependent on the government for their every need.  Talk about cutting off the hand that feeds you!  

 

- Rebecca Kachuriak (08/17/11 1:05 AM)

Brian, thank you so very much. We would love to have you stop by more often!

Rebecca, great question: How would liberals react to reading books like this?  Would a book like this open their eyes? When talking to liberals at work or elsewhere, I usually feel like I win the argument, yet I never seem to win the war, so to speak. It's frustrating, to say the least.

Rebecca, you would probably be better qualified to answer a question like this though. Was there any reading material in particular that helped you in your "conversion"? Was it just that you had to be at a place in life where you were willing to listen to the other side with an open mind? 

- Matthew Cochrane (08/17/11 6:41 AM)

 Personally, I have known a lot of liberals in my life and have debated many of them over the years, especially at work.  I have never known any of them to let facts or actual science stand in the way of their personal opinions and prejudicces.  

I have had liberals tell me with a perfectly staight face that America NEVER helped the poor until Obama was president, totally ignoring the trillions in werlfare programs.  I have had them make every excuse in the book to avoid confronting the truth.  It seems that the rediculous statements made by their "leaders" such as Debbie Wasserman Schultz and others really do have a purpose because no sooner do they say these things that we conservative find incomprehensible than other, ordinary liberals are all of a sudden parrotting them.  They are the most brainwashed people in America.

- Verbatim (08/17/11 12:22 PM)

 toff for enquiring minds (I had to look it up) means the upper level rich

- c (08/18/11 9:44 AM)

I enjoy reading Steyn, but for the quality of the reality-check no one can touch v
Michael Scheuer. Is Steyn a defender of the idea that the USA is antagonizing the Muslim world by our culture and our liberties? If so, he iswrong; we are in trouble -and debt - past our eyeballs because we insist on maintaining troops in their lands and by so doing enrage the significant percentage of fundamentalists in Muslim lands We need to get out of the Mideast altogether, cut our ties to Israel, and get serious about independence in energy. The USA didn't inherit the British Empire, rather we  were the last man standing after WW2. The USA is inhabitated by an ex-colonial people, and isolationism runs deep. If you polled Americans you would find a clear majority of us have never wanted an empire, and even more so now. A constant in British history is a fascination and an attachment to empire, on the contrary.

- mark (08/28/11 3:58 PM)

mark, the idea that if the US  were to pull out of the Middle East, all the hostile fundamentalist Muslims would suddenly embrace us and stop trying to kill us is as naive as Obama's failed attempts to curry favour and negotiate with them.  In case you haven't noticed, killing the infidel is the raison d'etre of these fundamentalists.  Eliminating one excuse (assuming it does - people with grievances have long memories) will merely pave the way for many more (charging someone for an honour-killing, requiring searches under burkas, basically any kind of "insult" to Muslims.  Remember Molly Norris?  The Danish cartoonist?  Theo van Gogh?   to my knowledge none of them were in the middle east.  ).  Meanwhile with the Americans gone they will have peace and quiet to plot another 9/11 or two (and maybe the wholesale destruction of Israel) without having to dodge all those pesky drones.

With regard to imperialism, you must have missed Ronald Reagan's speech: "We occupy no country. The only land abroad we occupy is beneath the graves where our heroes rest".  That is true to this day.

 

- Greg (08/29/11 6:23 PM)

Bravo Greg,

I am a recovering Liberal (not conservative but...) I love your response to Mark and you have voiced opinions that have been discussed in my house for many years.  Why is it that so many people cannot see that there is no "appeasing" this enemy?

 

- Rosemary (09/06/11 12:27 PM)

Hi, I am from Australia. Is this what you mean by "conservative" values. Goebbels would have loved this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EL5Atp_vF0 Seems like Christian fascism too me. As predicted by Sinclair Lewis. - John (09/29/11 1:28 AM)

John, I have no idea what you're getting at. Are you objecting to a slick ad during an election cycle? If you are, what does that have to do with "Christian fascism?" For that matter, what does any of Perry's message have to do with Christian fascism? The Left seems painfully ignorant about fascism. To educate yourself John, why don't you start here.

- Matthew Cochrane (09/29/11 1:37 AM)


Comment:
Name:
Website: http://
Enter the letters:

Complete Blog Archive


SPONSORS





Search Products:



Recent Activity:

Debunking Stupid Liberal Arguments: Are Fire Departments Evidence of Socialism?

Sanford Wins Special Election in SC

Explaining the Left's Reluctance to Call Out Militant Islam

A Small Victory for Religious Liberty

Stating the Obvious: Examining the Boston Bombers' Root Motivation


Top 5 Posts of the Month:

 Stating the Obvious: Examining the Boston Bombers' Root Motivation

 Explaining the Left's Reluctance to Call Out Militant Islam

 Sanford Wins Special Election in SC

 A Small Victory for Religious Liberty

Recently Viewed Posts:

 Revealed: Why Osama Bin Laden was Buried at Sea

 Gun Control Laws: Where Common Sense Is Not So Common, an Officer’s Perspective

 Debunking Stupid Liberal Arguments: Can We Pay Off Our National Debt by Taxing the Rich?

 Healthcare Protest: The Capitol

 21 Things: Fiscal Cliff Crisis Averted! (For At Least Two Months)

Top Ten Most Commented

 Saturday Morning Videos: The Beauty and the Beast (260)

 Federal Judge Strikes Down California Law Banning Same Sex Marriages (Update 1: Former Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General John Yoo's Thoughts) Update 2: Judge Who Decided Case is Openly Gay; Update 3: Charles Krauthammer: Doing It This Way is Wrong (65)

 Having Our Cake and Eating It Too: Fiscal and Social Issues Are Not Mutually Exclusive (58)

 Debunking Stupid Liberal Arguments: Are Fire Departments Evidence of Socialism? (55)

 The Real Reason Why President Obama Will Not Release the Osama Bin Laden Death Photos; Update 1: Uh oh, Michael Moore Agrees? (53)

 The Fair Tax Scam! (45)

 Guest Blog: Defending the Claims in The Party of Death (40)

 Glenn Beck's 828 (37)

 The Liberal Thought Police Strikes Again: Gay Sensitivity Trumps First Amendment Rights in the Classroom (37)

 When Liberals Attack: Leftist Union Protester Attacks Tea Partier at Fort Lauderdale Townhall Meeting (35)


Top Ten Hits All-Time

 When Liberals Attack: Leftist Union Protester Attacks Tea Partier at Fort Lauderdale Townhall Meeting

 Saturday Morning Videos: The Beauty and the Beast

 Debunking Stupid Liberal Arguments: Are Fire Departments Evidence of Socialism?

 Glenn Beck's 828

 President Obama Continues to Seek to Cut VA Benefits

 A Few More Items for that National Conversation on Guns We're Having

 R. Lee Ermey to Lobby Congress

 Obama's Early Economic Woes

 Missile Defense Agency - New Logo?

 Automotive Industry - Global and Big 3 Bailout Update 2

Feeds / Connections:



Add to My AOL Add to Google

SPONSOR


©2011 Conservative 21